Categories
Search


Advanced Search
 »  Home  »  eXpress Software  »  From Diagnostics to Prognostics with eXpress  »  Trade-offs for Diagnostics and Prognostics
From Diagnostics to Prognostics with eXpress
by DSI Staff | Published  7/30/2004 | eXpress Software
Trade-offs for Diagnostics and Prognostics
During the maturation of the diagnostics, tests are best created in sets that represents types of testing. In this way, a test set will typically contain a group of similar tests like Initiated BIT. This grouping of tests is what enables simple diagnostic trade studies.

Incorporating Prognostics into the diagnostic approach requires understanding of a few basic principles:

  • Prognostics can't increase Detection Coverage
  • Prognostics can reduce ambiguity
  • Prognostics can detect failures before they occur
  • Prognostic Tests can detect failure before Diagnostic Tests

Therefore, we can conclude that as we add Prognostics, our detection percentage should remain the same. What we will hope for is detection before a critical failure, or fault isolation to a smaller fault group.

To add Prognostic knowledge to the design, the problem is broken into two parts:

  • Trend Analysis and Prediction
  • Detection of Impending Failure
Comments
Article Options
Popular Articles
  1. Early Functional Analysis and Allocation in the System Engineering Process
  2. Trade Studies, Risk Management, Simulation, Oh My!
  3. From Diagnostics to Prognostics with eXpress
  4. Diagnostic Optimization of Large-Scale Systems
  5. IVHM Design Using eXpress
Popular Authors
  1. DSI Staff
  2. DSI Admin